Author Guidelines
Submissions must be original and should not have been published previously or be under consideration for publication while being evaluated for TICASH 2022. All submitted papers will be double blind reviewed by internationally reputable reviewers.
You can publish the manuscript and deliver presentation on TICASH 2022.
Please submit Full-length Manuscript for review before the submission deadline to https://easychair.org/conferences/?conf=ticash2022.
You can download Paper's Template here.
REVIEW POLICIES
Peer Review Process
All submitted full papers will be peer reviewed. The acceptance will be granted if the recommendations from the reviewers are positive. The criteria are based on the technical contents, clarity and format. Authors should make sure the submitted papers use the template for this conference. There are three review processes: Initial Review, Peer Review and Recommendation.
Initial Review
The committee evaluated each manuscript in the submission track to determine if its topic and content is suitable for consideration for the TICASH 2021 before being reviewed. Manuscripts that do not meet minimum criteria are returned to the authors. This is in the best interest of the authors who could then decide to either correct the problems or to submit the manuscript to a more appropriate venue, avoiding delays from a lengthy review process that would nonetheless lead to rejection.
Peer Review
Manuscripts that pass the initial review by the committee, will be sent to several referees based on their expertise. Each manuscript is reviewed by at least two referees. The referees are asked to evaluate the manuscript based on its originality, soundness of methodology, impact to design research, and relevance to design practices. To facilitate timely publication, referees are asked to complete their reviews and provide individual critiques within two weeks. After collecting the referees' reports, the committee makes a recommendation on the acceptability of the manuscript.
Acceptance Decision
Based on the referees' comments, the committee makes a final decision on the acceptability of the manuscript and communicates to the authors the decision, along with referees' reports. The status reports to reviewers should identify the reviewers of each paper, the final decision can be "Accept Submission", "Revisions Require", or "Decline Submission." The revised version should be submitted considering the review comments.